GI Oncology Daily Digest

August 6, 2026 — Thin-Week Edition — SOLARIS Retires the Vitamin D Question in Colorectal Cancer
Curated by Dr. Allan Pereira — Moffitt Cancer Center

Top 5 Papers

#1
Source: JAMA  |  Authors: Kimmie Ng, Fang-Shu Ou, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt — Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (A021703), US National Clinical Trials Network, multicenter  |  Published: August 3, 2026
Score: 12/20 — Base 8 (JAMA — general-medicine journal of the same class as NEJM and Lancet; scored one step below Lancet's 9 because the digest's table does not list JAMA and this is an oncology paper in a general journal) + phase III RCT (+3) + colleague engagement (+1, surfaced by a colleague on X) = 12. No clinical-impact bonus: the trial is definitively negative, so no new standard of care and no survival benefit.
SOLARIS (Alliance A021703) is the properly powered phase III test of an idea that has circled colorectal oncology for a decade — that high-dose vitamin D3 improves outcomes in metastatic disease. 455 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomized double-blind across the US National Clinical Trials Network to mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with either high-dose D3 (8000 IU daily for 14 days as a loading dose, then 4000 IU daily) or standard-dose D3 (400 IU daily), continued until progression or intolerance. Median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI 10.3–13.3) with high-dose versus 10.3 months (9.4–12.2) with standard dose — a 1.5-month numerical gap that did not approach significance (1-sided log-rank p=0.25). The secondary endpoints were equally flat: objective response rate 51% (44–58%) versus 44% (37–50%), p=0.12, and median overall survival 25.6 versus 27.0 months, p=0.66. There were no clinically meaningful differences in grade ≥3 adverse events (neutropenia 32% vs 30%, hypertension 20% vs 23%) and no excess vitamin D–associated toxicity. Median follow-up was 20 months; database freeze July 2024.
Post angle: This is how you retire your own hypothesis. Kimmie Ng's group generated the SUNSHINE phase II signal and then ran the trial that killed it. Supplement deficient patients; stop treating 4000 IU as an anticancer drug. #GIOnc #CRC #ColorectalCancer #EvidenceBasedMedicine
#2
Source: Clinical Cancer Research  |  Authors: Joseph C. Broderick, N. Jewel Samadder, Carol A. Burke — Brooke Army Medical Center, Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic and 5 further US centers  |  Published: August 3, 2026
Score: 9/20 — Base 6 (Clinical Cancer Research) + phase II (+2) + biomarker-guided/precision (+1, a genetically defined APC-mutant hereditary population rather than an unselected cohort) = 9.
Familial adenomatous polyposis has almost no medical therapy — patients face lifelong endoscopic surveillance and eventual colectomy, and the duodenum remains a mortality driver long after the colon is gone. This phase II trial assigned 30 FAP patients to three dosing regimens of encapsulated rapamycin (eRapa, 0.5 mg): every other day (cohort 1), daily every other week (cohort 2), or daily (cohort 3), with safety, pharmacokinetics, and 6-month percentage change from baseline in colorectal polyp burden as co-primary endpoints. 29 of 30 patients (97%) completed the 12-month study with predictable bioavailability; low-grade adverse events were frequent and most pronounced on daily dosing, and 2 patients discontinued for toxicity. Cohort 1 had the largest 6-month reductions — duodenal polyp burden −33.3% (IQR 90; p=0.04), colorectal polyp burden −39.4% (IQR 108.9; p=0.28), and total polyp burden −38.6% (IQR 88.5; p=0.26) — so only the duodenal endpoint cleared significance. Pooling the two intermittent cohorts against daily dosing, duodenal burden fell at 6 months (p=0.04) and total burden improved at 12 months (p=0.05). The 0.5 mg daily-every-other-week schedule now advances to phase III.
Post angle: Less rapamycin worked better than more — that is the actual finding here, and it is the one that matters for a drug patients would take for decades. n=30 with one significant secondary endpoint is a signal, not a result, but FAP has so little else that the phase III is worth running. #GIOnc #CRC #FAP #Chemoprevention
#3
Source: Clinical Cancer Research  |  Authors: Amanda Hahn, Angelica Loskog, Gustav J. Ullenhag — Uppsala University and Karolinska Institute, Sweden  |  Published: August 3, 2026
Score: 6/20 — Base 6 (Clinical Cancer Research). No study-type bonus — this is a phase I/IIb dose-escalation with a 3+3 design, and phase I trials are excluded from the study-type bonus even where the expansion cohorts carry the efficacy data. No impact bonus: single-arm, n=41, no comparator.
LOAd703 is an oncolytic adenoviral vector engineered to deliver CD40L and 4-1BBL directly into the tumour microenvironment — an attempt to inflame immunologically cold tumours from the inside rather than through systemic checkpoint blockade. LOKON002 (NCT03225989) was an open-label, single-arm phase I/IIb trial giving up to eight biweekly intratumoral injections plus a gemcitabine-based backbone to 41 patients with pancreatic (n=29), colorectal (n=5), ovarian (n=4), and biliary (n=3) cancers, with dose escalation by standard 3+3 and expansion of the two highest dose levels. Tolerability was the primary endpoint and was met: the commonest treatment-related events were pyrexia (76%), chills (39%), and fatigue (34%), predominantly grade 1–2. Response was both dose- and setting-dependent — ORR was 0 in the 5×10^10 viral particle cohort, 25% at 1×10^11, and 12% at 5×10^11 — and every patient with an objective response had first-line pancreatic cancer, giving a 35% ORR within that subgroup. Paired tumour sampling showed significant upregulation of Th1 immunity biomarkers at week 13, with several patients achieving long-term stable disease.
Post angle: "All responders were first-line pancreatic" is either a real biological signal or a small-numbers artefact — and the week-13 Th1 data argues for the former. Single-arm, n=41, so hold the champagne. But an intratumoral CD40/4-1BB payload is exactly the kind of thing worth pairing with a checkpoint inhibitor in PDAC. #PDAC #PancreaticCancer #GIOnc #Immunotherapy

Additional Papers of Interest

  1. EBioMedicine — Keio University group shows the D-amino acid d-serine suppresses CD8+ T-cell immunity and drives SPP1+ immunosuppressive macrophages; plasma d-serine was elevated in gastric cancer across three cohorts (n=150 patients, 87 healthy controls), tracked stage I–IV, and predicted poor response to anti-PD-1 monotherapy.
  2. Journal of Nuclear Medicine — prospective FAPeCa phase 2 study (n=61, colorectal and ovarian cancer) found FAPI PET agreed best with surgicopathologic peritoneal cancer index (ICC 0.81 vs MRI 0.76 vs FDG PET 0.54) with the highest segment-level sensitivity (77.6% vs 67.0% vs 47.5%) though lower specificity, and held up after recent chemotherapy.
  3. Journal of Clinical Oncology — Chen, Xi and colleagues respond to two letters questioning tolerance and follow-up in their definitive tislelizumab-plus-chemoradiotherapy trial in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and address whether NRF2 pathway status and maintenance immunotherapy exposure explain the observed outcomes.
Back to all digests